Talk:Waldorf Salad (Fawlty Towers)

BBC: Sitcoms Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by BBC Sitcoms Task Force.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: British / Episode coverage / Fawlty Towers Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Fawlty Towers task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Joke of this episode[edit]

Having watched this episode, I noticed that this episode was playing into the commonly held belief around the world that people in Britain are unwilling to speak their minds - in this episode, all the British guests do not speak their minds when the opportunity comes to them, and yet the American guest does whenever he can. Perhaps it is not wholly appropriate to add to the page, but I thought it would perhaps be a good idea to suggest it be put in. 195.59.167.114 (talk) 15:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Centralized TV Episode Discussion[edit]

Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. --Maniwar (talk) 01:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Waldorf salad ft.jpg[edit]

Image:Waldorf salad ft.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move[edit]

Shouldn't this article be moved to Waldorf Salad? The capital S could be used to distinguish it from Waldorf salad, and a dab link could be used at the top of the page in case people were looking for the article on the salad. leevclarke (talk) 15:52, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Concurred. Especially now that Waldorf Salad is a redirect to the dish. --StrexcorpEmployee (talk) 17:29, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most popular?[edit]

I couldn't help but notice this statement in the article; "Along with The Germans, it is generally considered one of the most popular episodes". Now, while I am aware that this is already tagged as 'citation needed', I feel it not merely in need of a citation, but in fact the OPPOSITE of the truth (i.e. One of the LEAST popular episodes, along with The Wedding Party). Certainly, it's not on the level of classics such as The Germans, Basil the Rat, or Communication Problems. In terms of popularity, of course, a Wikipedia talk page is hardly the place to make judgements on their quality. --31.49.114.175 (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]