Talk:Walter Woon

Walter Woon has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 20, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 25, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Walter Woon, former Attorney-General of Singapore, was the first Member of Parliament since Singapore's independence to have a private member's bill become a public law?

It is requested that a photograph of Walter Woon be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Singapore may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Singapore High‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anybody?[edit]

This article is close to passing GA, but I can't pass it as is. Someone needs to check Talk:Walter Woon/GA1 to see what needs to be done. If nobody responds in a couple days, I'll have to fail this article. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:17, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't the editor who nominated the article but I did a major expansion of it a while back. Let me have a look at your comments over the next few days. — Regards, Truth's Out There _{(speak the truth)} 17:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Take your time (within reason) and get back to me when you're ready. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:16, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there wasn't much that needed fixing. I think I've addressed all the issues. Have a look. (Sorry, couldn't find any free image.) — Regards, Truth's Out There _{(speak the truth)} 17:59, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, there really wasn't much to do, which is why I didn't want to fail it. Thanks for your help. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:17, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! — Regards, Truth's Out There _{(speak the truth)} 18:31, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Walter Woon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.joh.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Johnian_News_24.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100322210657/http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC100316-0000062/Clemency-not-matter-for-judiciary to http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC100316-0000062/Clemency-not-matter-for-judiciary
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC100419-0000061/An-opportunity-missed
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sal.org.sg/Lists/NewsReleases/DispForm.aspx?ID=37&Source=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sal.org.sg%2FContent%2Fpressroom_news_releases.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]