Talk:War of the Bavarian Succession/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- This is a little awkward; is there a missing 'the'? The closest line of kinship, Sulzbach line, stood as heir to the Duchy of Bavaria.
- yes. added.
- This is a little awkward; is there a missing 'the'? The closest line of kinship, Sulzbach line, stood as heir to the Duchy of Bavaria.
- B. MoS compliance:
- Inconsistent capitalization in your source's titles. Needs a location for Simms
- yes, added
- Inconsistent capitalization in your source's titles. Needs a location for Simms
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
How closely related were Charles II August and Max Joseph? It is not clear why Frederick judged Joseph's position to be so strong. With Henry in his rear I'd expect Joseph to be very vulnerable. Did he build all-around fortifications or what?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- OK, these are addressed. My only caveat is that it might be useful to add Laudon's position to the map.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)