Talk:War of the Roses (radio show)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

[Untitled][edit]

I believe that something needs to be mentioned in this article that the war of the roses is done by actors due to the fact that it is illegal to put someone on the air without their knowledge. -- 66.167.235.171 (talk)

This information was there but removed for some reason. It has been restored.--Rtphokie (talk) 01:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This problem persists. See page history. De728631 (talk) 17:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think someone needs to provide a citation for FCC rules preventing it from being real. Otherwise, that's an unfounded assertion. 128.157.160.13 (talk) 20:29, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think its valid to mention that FCC rules make this type of show illegal as presented to the audience. However, I have removed the language stating that that is *why* the stations use actors. There is no evidence to suggest the stations' motivations. Perhaps, lacking the FCC rule, they would still use actors because it is more entertaining? --RobertGary1 (talk) 02:01, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited Assertion Removed[edit]

I've removed the first two paragraphs of this article asserting fakery and giving the lengthy explanation of the FCC rules on recording and broadcasting conversations, as the assertion was unsupported since April 2012 and the rules made no sense without it. I added a very brief description of the premise and the holder of the "War of the Roses" service mark, but this article really needs to be heavily revised or completely rewritten, including a cited source for fakery if that assertion is to be made. --Chuckhoffmann (talk) 19:30, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]