Talk:Warhead (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: article moved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:51, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Warhead (1977 film)Warhead (film) — The article at "Warhead (film)" currently relates to an unused proposed title for a James Bond film by Kevin McClory which evolved ultimately into the film Never Say Never Again. An unused proposed title does not merit its own article. That article currently redirects to Never Say Never Again, but that is not a useful redirect because the target page contains no mention of "Warhead" as a proposed title. The title "Warhead (film)" should instead apply to the actual 1977 film described here. I have added a reference into this article directing readers who wish to learn about "Warhead" as the unused proposed title for a James Bond film to a page where some information on that can actually be found. I therefore propose that the current redirect at "Warhead (film)" be discarded, and this article be moved from "Warhead (1977 film)" to "Warhead (film)", with a new redirect from "Warhead (1977 film)" to "Warhead (film)" in the conventional manner. Mooncow (talk) 19:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom Kauffner (talk) 03:01, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per WP:NCF. Additionally, the link Warhead (film) should redirect to the page Warhead (disambiguation). Fortdj33 (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    After cleaning up the disambiguation page, I still oppose the renaming of the film, but I fixed the link Warhead (film) to redirect to the primary topic instead. Fortdj33 (talk) 18:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm confused about your stance. There is one film on Wikipedia that uses the term "Warhead". Since this is the case, we do not need to use the release year. Am I missing something? Erik (talk | contribs) 19:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    No, I withdraw my opposition, since the link to the proposed film title for Never Say Never Again has been fixed, and there is only one other film with that title. However, if another article about a film titled Warhead is ever created, then both films will need to be disambiguated with the year of release, and Warhead (film) will need to redirect to Warhead (disambiguation). Fortdj33 (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay, that makes sense. Thanks. Erik (talk | contribs) 23:47, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support since there is only one film on Wikipedia with the title "Warhead". I think the mention of Never Say Never Again at Warhead (disambiguation) is sufficient. Erik (talk | contribs) 23:47, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
  • Oppose "Warhead" (unmade James Bond film) is not 'Never Say Never Again'. It was a completely different and original script while NSNA was a re-make of 'Thunderball'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cybopath (talkcontribs) 23:46, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]