Talk:Warnbro railway station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 05:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

I'll look at this tomorrow when I am more awake! — GhostRiver 05:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

• No comma needed after "with seven bus stands"
• "The station was known as Waikiki station during planning. The station was included" → "Known as Waikiki station during planning, the station was included"

Description

• First instance of "Transperth" in the body should be linked
• No comma needed after "transit officer booth"

Public art

• No comma needed after "with help from TUES"

History

• "was planned on only being single track" → "was only intended to be single track"
• No comma needed after "spur off the Armadale line"
• "These changes caused the predicted patronage at Waikiki station to be lower." → 'These changes lowered the predicted patronage at Waikiki station."
• "between Perth and Waikiki to be opened"

Services

• "2013-14 financial year" → "2013–14 financial year"

References

• Good

General comments

• Photos are properly licensed and relevant
• No stability concerns in the revision history
• Earwig score looks good

All minor changes! Putting on hold for now; feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — GhostRiver 17:37, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for doing this review @GhostRiver:. I have made all the changes you requested. Steelkamp (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Looks good now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 15:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)