Jump to content

Talk:Washington State Route 168/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:CGTalk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "Forrest Roads" in RD.
    Fixed. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No reference for the final sentence of RD.
    Doesn't really need one, look at any map to see any detour. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    An image of the area would be nice, but not necessary for GAs.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just fix the two comments and its all good. Merry Christmas! –CGTalk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks all good. Pass. Merry Christmas! –CGTalk 06:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]