Jump to content

Talk:Washington State Route 27

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWashington State Route 27 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 17, 2013Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 27/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 23:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Later tonight, probably. I'm having too much fun reverting vandals at the moment. –TCN7JM 23:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Route description

  • I'd take the decimals off of 90.00-mile-long. It's fine in the lead because you should say exactly how long the route is in the intro, but it seems like overkill here.
    •  Done, but {{convert}} won't accept rounding the km to 2 decimal places
  • Does Downtown need to be capitalized in "Downtown Pullman"?
    •  Lowercase'd
  • "least busiest" is the most dumbest adjective ever :p
    •  Replaced with "least busy", per IRC discussion

History

  • I would split the last sentence in two, personally. The last phrase in the sentence makes it read worse than it would if it were in two sentences.
    •  Split

Major intersections

Final verdict

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall: Good job! Just these few things. –TCN7JM 02:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass/Fail:
I made a couple of minor changes, and I'm passing the article! –TCN7JM 03:39, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]