Jump to content

Talk:Washington State Route 339

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWashington State Route 339 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 11, 2008Good article nomineeListed
October 5, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
October 6, 2012WikiProject A-class reviewDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 12, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Washington State Route 339 is actually a ferry route?
Current status: Good article

Merger

[edit]
The following is an archived roads merger proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the merger proposal was Maybe this should be merged into Washington State Ferries. --NE2 02:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 339/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a nice piece of work, but it is short and needs images.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    You need to add a photo. Maybe one of MV Kalama or the ferry docks.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Good luck improving the article. ~~ ĈĠ Simple? 00:23, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind. Passed. ~~ ĈĠ Simple? 00:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article needs plenty of work, and I strongly disagree with passing it. First, all footnotes need to be after the period. Second, the prose needs work. Third, the article lacks historical information. When was the road constructed? Designated? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:58, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(Reply as uninvolved, I myself am neutral) Uh, does that mean the creator has to include when the water was formed? Pie is good (Apple is the best) 20:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? All I want is when the route was designated. The water didn't always have a 339 designation over a stretch of it. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
339 was named in 1994 per the RCW which is listed in the article --Admrb♉ltz (talk) 03:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]