Talk:Water by the Spoonful
Water by the Spoonful was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 22, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
A fact from Water by the Spoonful appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 July 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA Review[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Water by the Spoonful/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 23:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Yet another QF of one of the mass-nominated articles. A large part of the "Concept" section is uncited. Production section and critical reception sections are both bullet point lists. Why is publication jammed in under critical reception? Why is Hudes' 2008 Tony mentioned here? Inexplicable. The nominator has enough experience to know that this is completely unacceptable, yet nominated the article anyway, desperate for WikiCup points. Absolutely not. I would not fail a less experienced nominator on those grounds, but I have zero interest in giving someone who should know better a free pass just for fake internet points. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)