Talk:Waterbury and Milldale Tramway

Waterbury and Milldale Tramway has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 3, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Waterbury and Milldale Tramway article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars (assessed as Low-importance).

New England Public Transit (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject New England Public Transit, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.New England Public TransitWikipedia:WikiProject New England Public TransitTemplate:WikiProject New England Public TransitNew England Public Transit articles

New York City: Public Transportation

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Waterbury and Milldale Tramway/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 05:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!! I'll review this on 2 August UTC. ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 05:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fun read! On hold; over to you. ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 22:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@LunaEatsTuna: Thanks for the review! My replies are below - nothing much except a few grammatical quibbles. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:09, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me! Pass. ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 21:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio check[edit]

Earwig is happy; I am happy.

File(s)[edit]

All files are appropriate, relevant and copyright-free—the first two have valid public domain rationale on Commons and the last one was taken and uploaded to Commons under CC BY-SA 4.0 by a Wikipedia user.

Prose[edit]

"in downtown Waterbury" – wikilink Waterbury as first mention in the body.
- Done
Should Cheshire in Cheshire line be wikilinked to Cheshire, Connecticut?
- Done
I would wikilink right-of-way for unfamiliar readers.
- Done
What does "on-street" mean? Should it say "situated on public roadways" or does it mean something else?
- I've reworded slightly to clarify.
I would start the next sentence with The.
- I don't think "The" is needed here.
"A streetcar line" – wikilink.
- Done
Does any source say why Woodruff vetoed it?
- Source 11 says His reason was that the tendency has been to overcapitalize such companies. That's a very generic explanation, and the implication I get from source 10 and other contemporary articles is that the actual reasons were much more complex and rooted in politics too esoteric for me to understand.
"about 1,500 feet (460 m) east from Milldale" – should it not be east of Milldale? Apologies of this is standard in American English, which I do not speak.
- My understand was that "from" matches "to", but I could be mistaken.
"to better connect with the Connecticut Company line" – how about "aiming to enhance connectivity with the Connecticut Company line" instead? Better connect sounds odd IMO.
- Done (with slightly different wording)
"creating an all-paved road" – recommend "fully-paved".
- Done
"CTtransit" should be "CT Transit" as the former is a stylisation.
- Done
"Two additional cars" – I would find a way to rephrase this since the last sentence also began with the same line. Relatedly:
- Done
I think "numbered 112 and 114" should use two dashes instead of commas since it describes attributes of the cars.
- I think either dashes or commas would have been fine, but with the rewording I don't think either are necessary.

Refs[edit]

Passes spotcheck on refs 2, 7, 20, 25, 38 and 48.

Others[edit]

Add a short description.
- Done
Recommend adding template:use mdy dates (optional).
- Done
Recommend adding template:use X English (optional).
- Done

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.