Talk:Waterford Township, New Jersey/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 16:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- The article has many short one sentence paragraphs.
- External links should not be included in the prose.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- There are large sections of the article that are unreferenced.
- There are several dead links in the article, check the tool.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Why is the mayor missing from the infobox?
- The lead is too short and does not provide an adequate summary of the article
- Many sections, such as the Geography section, seem incomplete.
- The article is missing many sections that make a complete article about a place, such as History, Climate, Crime, Economy, Arts ans Culture, and Notable residents. See Teaneck, New Jersey for an example of what this article should look like.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Some pictures of the township would be nice, but not required.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The article has too many issues that would take more than a week to fix. In addition, it appears the nominator is not a major contributor to the article. Therefore, I will have to fail the article. The article may be renominated once all the issues are addressed. Dough4872 16:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)