Talk:Watkins 32

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Watkins 32 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sailing Low‑importance

	Watkins 32 is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Watkins 32[edit]

Desculpe, porém tenho que ressaltar na descrição de caracteristicas técnicas do veleiro watkins 32 foram colocadas várias medidas e pesos em contraposição não tendo a devida conversão de kg/libras e mts/pés . estas medidas estão invertidas. Quem editou se confundiu demasiadamente errado invertendo as lógicas de pesos e comprimentos. 2804:7F4:C2AF:5371:2045:3A2:D78:C52F (talk) 18:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In reviewing all the specifications in the text, the numbers all look correct and as per the ref cited. Can you indicate which ones you think are incorrect? - Ahunt (talk) 19:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]