Jump to content

Talk:Wavering Radiant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWavering Radiant has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 16, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
June 10, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

History section

[edit]

I'd like to try to get the background of this puppy nailed, so it can eventually be a stellar article. If anyone has any information, please fill in.

Possible sources
  • Decibel (51). 2009. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help) – probably only a minor feature. Not all that important.
  • Metal Hammer (191). 2009. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help) 1
  • Revolver interview with Turner[dead link]
  • Revolver preview[dead link]
  • Fairly informative blog post (October)
  • end-of-year listing
    • Debatable relevance and notability.
  • Behind a paywall
Sources already used and ground already covered
Click to show, if you care for any strange reason

Plenty more to concern ourselves with in the future, I'm sure. Seegoon (talk) 18:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes from Podcast

[edit]
  • It "took quite a bit longer than any previous Isis record and that was emotionally intentional. In the past, we'd tried to sort of write towards a recording deadline and this time around we tried to take the opposite approach where we left the end date for the recording open-ended and tried finish the bulk of the writing before we even considered when we might actually get to the studio to make it happen."

More maybe. [2] Seegoon (talk) 19:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More reviews

[edit]

If anybody finds any (or if anybody else reads this), you may as well post them here for archive purposes and for use in a future 'Reception' section.

Seegoon (talk) 14:57, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to the other section. Seegoon (talk) 01:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sandboxing

[edit]

If anybody reads this and wants to come help, I'm creating a draft for a Reception section in my sandbox. Seegoon (talk) 15:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed sources

[edit]

Rather than casting these into oblivion, I thought it might be prudent to retain old sources, even if they don't provide anything particularly fresh.

Seegoon (talk) 23:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]