Talk:Weatherfield

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Big edit

As you'll probably see, I've started a big edit to this page. Most of it isn't all that detailed because a good reference book I have called "Weatherfield Life" has gone walk-about! When I get it back, I will write more.

I have left the original information regarding Weatherfield High, Weatherfield Arms etc. It would probably be useful to have sections for educational institutions (Weatherfield High, Weatherfield Girls' School & Oakhill Private School) and quite a substantial list of pubs and of course the Newton & Ridley's Brewery.

I don't understand the last line or what relevance it has to Weatherfield. The set of Coronation Street may well move from central Manchester to Salford, but that does not mean that Weatherfield is moving - the town is fictional afterall! Ben 03:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed you have been putting alot of work in expanding the article, which is great! It isn't often I see an article (in a stub state it was previously), be generated into an article with a wealth of information over night (literally).

I have noticed you have been using alot of line breaks (such as <br>), some of which were unncessary and I have removed (near the top). The others further down I can understand why they have been placed (to keep the format of the article intact), but may not look the way as intended with different resolutions, unless of course further information is planned. It seems as if it's only been partially revamped by yourself, so I will assume that's the case. Good stuff! Bungle44 22:41, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. I added the line breaks between 'Industrial & Modern Weatherfield' and 'Areas of Weatherfield' because I am planning on filling the blank section out once I have the book to source from. Ben 23:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Forgot to add that I've scanned and uploaded a map of Coronation Street and its surrounding streets that I drew a couple of years back! Ben 03:54, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like the map very much, but just to ask, you know in corrie they have the arch next to the rovers.... what is that all about and what is the purpose of it? to hide the ITV buildings behind the street in real life? they could have come up with something betterlike trees or a big bill board or even a sliding door that has a fake street printed on it or just leave it all to the camera tricks and digital enhancement...

Also the rosmand street health centre isnt on your map as it is and the streets behind coronation street, have they ever been mentioned? just wondering how you drew the map based on my questions above, cheers I think its great though! maybe an updated one would be good! Bankhallbretherton (talk) 18:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coronation Street itself

Article lacks mention of when it was built or which coronation the name refers to. -88.109.76.231 12:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Weatherfield quays.jpg

Image:Weatherfield quays.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Newton and Ridley.jpg

The image File:Newton and Ridley.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --17:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of giant lists

I moved the giant lists to their own page (accessable via the Corrie box) they messed up the article and took up too much space, this article is about Weatherfield, not a database on who lives where on the street --Ant parker (talk) 13:38, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Missing places

I have thought of some places that have been missed off from past and present! Would it be an idea to include the following on this page?

The church that sophie webster and emily bishop go to
Freshco
Penny King's factory of bathrobes
The allotments that jack duckworth went to

Anymore i havent included please list here and your thoughts on the above would be appreciated! Bankhallbretherton (talk) 02:43, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some past places include;

The Quarryman's Rest - where Bet and Alec were to be exiled when the brewery wanted to turn The Rovers into an American themed bar called Yankees.
Ingram's - where Mike Baldwin worked for a while. What actually happened to that?
The Graffiti Club, the pub run by Alec Gilroy pre his Rovers days.

Re: the abovementioned places. Good idea to mention them, I think. TheRetroGuy (talk) 14:21, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Graffiti Club became what is now the Medical Centre! JMRH6 (talk) 16:26, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've also missed out the (British) Legion which is a place that was regularly mentioned in the Albert Tatlock/Stan Ogden era. Besides the Rovers it was always the Flying Horse and the Legion that were mentioned as their regular haunts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.171.223 (talk) 19:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Business

Hi as the Business page was merged with here, I thought would it not be nice to include a list of employees at each business, i dont think theres anywhere thats stated, also, an info box for the business; giving basic details (A photo for the majority, Rovers, Kabin, Kebab Shop etc., the owner, location, street, how long its been there etc.) Just to try and improve each sections, any thoughts? Mintyyyy 2010 (talk) 13:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Minty! like the idea! try it out on a sandbox page and let me know how it goes :) As you may have seen ive put it on to the business i think its defo. adds something to each section! Mintyyyy 2010 (talk) 21:35, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[1] - JuneGloom Talk 19:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article mistake

The article states Weatherfield is in Salford, yet it reads "Coronation Street reflected changes in local administration when, in 1974, the County Borough of Weatherfield became a Metropolitan Borough, part of the Greater Manchester county following the Local Government Act 1972." As Salford is a borough of Greater Manchester and Weatherfield is a fictional borough of Greater Manchester, Weatherfield, cannot be in Salford, as it is two seperate areas. Isn't it possible that Weatherfield is based upon Salford, rather than in it? 86.136.255.232 (talk) 18:33, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]