Talk:Wellesbourne, Brighton

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brighton Low‑importance

	East Sussex portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brighton, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource about Brighton and Hove. If you would like to participate, please visit the project pageBrightonWikipedia:WikiProject BrightonTemplate:WikiProject BrightonBrighton articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

(

)

Source: Tim Carder, The Encyclopaedia of Brighton (1990), section 201. The date is also given in other sources.

Created by Hassocks5489 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 98 past nominations.

Hi Hassocks5489, another excellent south-coast article, really fascinating. Review follows: article created 20 June and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; sources used are mostly offline but I found no issues with overly close paraphrasing from the online ones; hook is interesting and mentioned in the article, happy to AGF that the offline sources support it; a QPQ has been provided. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 11:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]