Talk:West Chiltington

Sussex Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal[edit]

Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.

Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie West Chiltington Common, Gay Street, Balls Green & Broadford Bridge to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 14:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further merge proposal[edit]

I have suggested that West Chiltington & Thakeham Cricket Club be merged into this article, since the cricket club article itself is not particularly notable or encyclopaedic, and currently is filled with information that is unsourced, saved for the club's own website. The page creator notes that the club is named for two villages, but since it meets and plays in West Chiltington, this seems the most appropriate location for a brief mention - perhaps a simple expansion on the current sport section. Tafkam (talk) 15:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As far as the West Chiltington and Thakeham articles are concerned, the club is already mentioned, possibly with scope for a small expansion on the club merger? I do not see a problem with the cricket club article staying though. There is a question of notability, there are some guidelines at WP:CRIN, so maybe let it run the gauntlet with an AfD? ++ MortimerCat (talk) 06:43, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on West Chiltington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608075926/http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf to http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]