This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
I removed from External links The Western Non-Interpolations at the Islamic Awareness, because it is only tertiary source. It is good for people who does not know the subject, but not for the comprehensive article. This source used only Metzger's book (all sentences rewritten):
Bruce M. Metzger, "A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament: A Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament", 1994, United Bible Societies, London & New York, pp. 164-166. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 20:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent article Leszek; and yes, published secondary sources are definitely preferable to tertiary websites. With your diligent work at Wikipedia, Wiki itself is becoming a quality tertiary source on NT mss. Thank you. Alastair Haines (talk) 02:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I did my undergraduate dissertation on precisely this subject (Leeds, 1988). It was awarded a 'first'. If anyone wants a copy you can email me on gilesbradley.web@gmail.com
Giles Bradley, Exeter, UK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.73.169.152 (talk) 08:28, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Email sent! Thank you for your very kind offer. I've given this section a title. If you ever get a spare afternoon, dropping a few lines in here would be very much appreciated. Leszek, I and others would be happy to massage things into Wiki manual of style form were you willing to give us any significant information already published by others. Alastair Haines (talk) 15:54, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, we want more professional wikipedia. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:10, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Abandoned the theory of Western non-interpolations"[edit]
This seems a bit sweeping. Obviously, if the passages are bracketed in the text, the theory is not "abandoned" entirely. The Western non-interpolations article makes the same claim with the same citation. --Tbanderson (talk) 20:56, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
