This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
First time grabbing an article under my new signature, I'll take this on soon but it will probably come in stages due to the article being very long but that's great to see one so large! --K. Peake17:46, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"many of whom commending" → "many of whom commended" Done
"the political message" → "the political message of "What About Us"" Done
""What About Us" was a commercial success" remove this sentence since it is redundant for the lead due to the other commercial performance sentences Done Replaced the sentence with "Commercially,"
"ninth number-one song on the" → "ninth song to top the" Done
"becoming the soloist" → "surpassing Katy Perry as the soloist" Done
"The track reached the summit of" → "The song reached the summit on" Done
"Poland, and Switzerland, and peaked within the top 10 in 12 others." → "Poland and Switzerland. It further peaked within the top 10 in 12 other territories, including Canada and the United Kingdom." Done
""What About Us" was nominated" → "The song was nominated" Done
"while being chased by helicopter searchlight hovers" are you sure this is true since the section does not say the helicopter chases them?
I believe it's true since the section does mention that there was "a helicopter police chase", and in the video, the searchlight that kept hovering over came from the same helicopter police chase. - Gabrielflorin01 (talk) 19:43, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"The visual attracted the attention of various music critics, who commended" → "The video received positive reviews from critics, who praised" Done
"live on multiple occasions, including the" → "live for the" Done
"other televised appearances, and her" → "other televised appearances, as well as her" Done
"which influenced her music." → "which influenced the music." Done
"while production was handled by the latter." → "with production being handled by Mac." Done
"In an interview with Vulture," → "In an interview with Vulture," with the target Done
"discussions and anecdotes between herself and McDaid" → "discussions and anecdotes with McDaid" Done
"for the songs. McDaid noted" → "for the album's songs, and McDaid noted" Done
"and she expressed herself" → "and expressed herself" Done
"during the same session;" → "during the session;" Done
"When asked about the inspiration behind the song and the development process," → "When asked about the creation of the song," as that's more accurate Done
Are you sure the quote box shouldn't be in the previous section instead since it seems more relevant to that? Done I was skeptical at first about having two long quotes in the same section, but it's definitely more relevant. I also added an image of Mac instead. - Gabrielflorin01 (talk) 20:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Upon release, "What About Us" was met with" → ""What About Us" was met with" Done
"commended the track, highlighting the singer's" → "commended the track and highlighted Pink's" Done
Vulture should be italicised Done
"Mike Nied of Idolator commended the track" → "Nied praised the track" Done
"Mike Wass from the same publication favored" → "Mike Wass, also from Idolator, favored" as this reminds us that the aforementioned is from the publication Done
"feelings" and her powerful voice." → "feelings", as well as Pink's powerful voice." Done
"and received a triple platinum" → "and ultimately received a triple platinum" Done
"and rose to number five" → "and rose to number 5" Done
"top 10 song in the nation." → "top 10 song in the United Kingdom." Done
"33,584 copies and spending three non-consecutive weeks in" → "33,584 units and spending three non-consecutive weeks at" Done
"The British Phonographic Industry (BPI) awarded a platinum certification to the song for accumulating 600,000 equivalent sales units in the UK." → "The song was later certified platinum by the British Phonographic Industry (BPI) for accumulating sales of 600,000 units in the UK." Done
"Across Europe," → "Across the rest of Europe," Done
I don't think the radio charts for the Czech Republic and Slovakia should be here, as the singles digital ones are already included for the countries Done
Fix the search for the Norway certification to include the song name as well as that of the artist Not done It's an automatic cert table entry, I'm not sure you change the search url manually - Gabrielflorin01 (talk) 12:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On hold after reviewing over the course of two days, props on how broad this article is but it still needs some fixes before becoming a GA. --K. Peake10:24, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyle Peake: Hi! Thank you very much for dedicating your time and energy into reviewing this article. I think I covered every suggestion and issue, except for some noted. Please let me know if I missed something or if there's anything else I can do. Greets; - Gabrielflorin01 (talk) 14:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gabrielflorin01: Very happy with such a quick response, sorry about the confusion due to refs being switched but what I called #114 is now #113, the France-Soir ref and it needs fixing. --K. Peake15:00, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]