Talk:What Ever Happened to SpongeBob?/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Buffbills7701 (talk · contribs) 14:36, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Well-Written[edit]
1A[edit]
The spelling and grammar is correct.
1B[edit]
It complies with the MoS.
Verifiable[edit]
2A[edit]
It contains a list of all the references in the article.
2B[edit]
It mentions twice that about 7.7 million viewers watched it, yet had no source to prove it.
- I've just move the ref close to the sentence. The source was there but I guess you didn't noticed it.
2C[edit]
Read 2B.
Done
Broad[edit]
3A[edit]
This article addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3B[edit]
This article stays on topic, and doesn't go into trivial detail.
Neutral[edit]
This article shows both sides of the reception.
Stable[edit]
There have been no recent edit wars.
Illustrated[edit]
6A[edit]
The article's pictures have a copyright or a fair-use on them.
6B[edit]
All of the pictures relate to the subject and have reasonable captions.
Notes:[edit]
- "The series follows the adventures of the title character in the underwater city of Bikini Bottom." For people who don't know the subject, I think that you should remove title character with SpongeBob or something along those lines.
Fixed I've just added "SpongeBob SquarePants".
- "Upon release, the episode attracted an average of 7.7 million audiences..." I honestly don't like the wording of 7.7 million audiences. Could you make it sound like 7.7 million viewers?
- Fixed
- Where are your sources for the amount of viewers?
- Done The sources are actually there but it so happen that I didn't put it close to the sentence.
Final Result[edit]
I'm putting it on hold, although you are really close. All you need is one source that tells me how many people watch it, and then I'll accept it. Good Luck! buffbills7701 15:08, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- I hope the article is all OK now to meet your and the GA criteria. Thank you very much for taking time to review this article. Thanks and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 02:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Since I'm mentoring the user on the GA process, I'll give this a second review sometime in the next couple days to make sure everything was caught. Wizardman 04:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Wizardman! I hope everything's fine on this ongoing GA review. Thanks and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 09:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
I read over the article a couple more times and made some tweaks, but I didn't see any major issues so I'll pass the article. Wizardman 16:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)