Talk:What Is... Cliff Clavin?/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 23:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):
   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):
   b (citations to reliable sources):
   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):
   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Infobox

• No issues

Lead

• No issues

Preface

• An explanation of Jeopardy! is not necessary as separate article explains how it is played
• Only include information that relates to this episode
  • Must people be forced to go to Jeopardy! article? The preface serves as a purpose for readers who do not have to read more about Jeopardy! --George Ho (talk) 00:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Plot

• No issues

Reception

• Combine all information in one paragraph, as it all relates to each other
  •  Done. --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Impact

• No issues

Notes

• References 1, 2 → Cite source in a "Bibliography section"
  •  Done --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
• Reference 5 → Publisher of "Chicago Tribune" needed.
  • It becomes #4 after replacing #3 with #2. Why needing Publisher? I tried finding one, but found author and no publisher. --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
• Reference 10 → "Google Books" should not be italicized
  • FN 10 becomes FN 9. I don't know why "Google" must not be italicized, but it is not formatted any way. --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
• Reference 12 → Publisher is needed
  • FN 12 becomes 11. Why needing Publisher? I could not find one publisher. --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
• Reference 13 → "InfoWorld" should not be italicized
  • Why not? It's a website. Also, it is italicized automatically with template. --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
• Reference 14 → Full web citation needed
  •  Done --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

External links

• "Fun trivia question on this website" should not be included in this section
  •  Done --George Ho (talk) 00:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Conclusion

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address other issues which you believe do not concern good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 23:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 03:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)