Jump to content

Talk:Where You Want to Be/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 04:12, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.

I was doing a few of them, but the end of quotes should look "like this." (period inside of quotation, per https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/577/03/ as an example)


1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.

Cite the track listing somehow (per the booklet, I'm sure)

2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.

Could you write a section on the album cover?

3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Are there any other images we could use at all? Any of them recording, touring for the album, etc?

7. Overall assessment.
I couldn't find any info on the cover artwork (I did find some info about the disc tray artwork but I wasn't sure where to include that). I couldn't find any images during this album cycle on Commons. Yeepsi (talk) 01:23, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. Apparently in British English the period and comma can either go inside or outside the quotation mark, so my apologies if you are British. All else is well, I couldn't find anything on the album art. I found some photos that are probably from them touring on Flickr under a Commons license, but none were very good. Feel free to look into them and add one if you wish. Otherwise, this is a pass.