Talk:Whipple's disease
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Whipple's disease.
|
question
[edit]Who is credited for discovering that Tropheryma whipplei causes Whipple's disease? ReasonableLogicalMan(Talk 20:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- PMID 1377787 seems to be the publication of relevance, although various groups were looking at bacterial rRNA prior to this result. JFW | T@lk 15:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- PMID 12672878 closes the circle: T. whipplei was detected in biopsies from Whipple's original 1907 patient! JFW | T@lk 15:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Recent reviews
[edit]The most recent reviews on this condition are:
- doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70042-2 - Lancet Infect Dis 2008
- doi:10.1097/MOG.0b013e3282f3f4f1 - Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2008
- doi:10.1056/NEJMra062477 - N Engl J Med 2007
Citing Didier Raoult at least once is going to be inevitable :-). JFW | T@lk 11:14, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- Primary source: immune reconstitution syndrome happens in about 10% and can be nasty: link. JFW | T@lk 22:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Expanding and updating
[edit]Now that I've started updating this I might as well give the article a good work-over and hopefully turn it into a useful resource. I still need to retrieve the Fenollar 2007 NEJM review. So far I've made expansions based on Schneider 2008. I will not use Marth & Schneider (2008, Curr Opin Gastroenterol)
By sections:
Done Signs and symptoms (could still add percentages, but probably meaningless)
- Mechanism (expand from Schneider and NEJM)
- Diagnosis (need expansion)
- Treatment (ditto)
- Epidemiology (could add something about prognosis)
- History (could have more historical content still)
Further input from everyone much appreciated. JFW | T@lk 11:36, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Treatment section is "correct but thin/wobbly." I may be able to work on appropriate WP:RSMED that address:
- FeatherPluma (talk) 01:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Nice work FeatherPluma! As you can see above I made this article one of my projects, and then I got distracted, possibly by an FAC elsewhere. I'll see what I can do to help, but sadly very busy in meatspace. With regards to the articles you mentioned, please bear in mind that we should be cautious with primary sources. JFW | T@lk 11:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Some inaccuracies, sources?
[edit]Looking through, there are some statements that seem inaccurate and some that are not properly sourced. Under the section "Diagnosis" - skin rashes are quoted as a clinical manifestation. I am not familiar with this as a symptom, and cannot find this in any source, including the one cited (a french article, there are many perfectly good English reviews to cite in an English encyclopedia...) I will now correct this. I will also post about any other corrections. Treatment is also out of date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibenami (talk • contribs) 23:12, 17 July 2014
- Hello Ibenami - I believe the rashes are mentioned in an old source. I agree that the article is in need of updating; I've listed some reviews above but I never got round to improving the article.
- Feel free to fix whatever is necessary and let me know if you need a hand! JFW | T@lk 15:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Review
[edit]doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00128-1 JFW | T@lk 04:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)