This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
The "family tree" we have is just for one small part of the Whitney family. Why do we have that? Shouldn't we either get rid of it, or label it correctly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:D6D0:4F60:1925:3342:1E97:A72D (talk) 20:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As noted in edit summary, since there was no comment or opposition to this in close to a year, I went ahead and removed the content. It was reverted by another user without specific objection to the intent of the edit, and I provided rationale to him on his talk page and invited him to bring concerns here. I have restored the edit. This content has not context, no descriptive text, is not relevant to the article as a whole (it's just a small piece of the giant Whitney family genealogy, and not one of any specific importance like the first generations of the original immigrant might have been.). If its intent is to show notable whitneys, there is already a section for that, whose format is better than this. Please do not revert again without bringing concerns over the edit here.12.11.127.253 (talk) 21:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
