Talk:Who's That Girl (Madonna song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. I was a fan of Madonna in high school (even had a picture in my locker for a spell), but I'll try not to let my bias influence this GAR :) To save us both time, I'll make minor edits as I go along, and bring the other stuff up for discussion here. My wiki-plate is pretty full, so the review may take a few days. Cheers, Sasata (talk) 02:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Update: I've done a fairly extensive copyedit of the prose. Review the changes and revert anything you don't agree with, and also check if I've inappropriately altered the meaning. Will be back in a day or two with the actual review (and probably more copyediting). Sasata (talk) 02:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Wonderful! I checked and its fine. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok, have made a few more small tweaks to the article prose. I checked out some of the online sources, and mostly everything checks out. One comment:

• "It was also featured on the promotional-only instore video compilations It's That Girl and She's Breathless.[24][25]" These citations are to Wikipedia articles, which is to be avoided. Can you find another print or web source that says the same?

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

Prose is reasonably well written; article complies with MOS.

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c(OR):

   The citations to online sources I checked were fine. Citations to wiki articles need to be removed or replaced.

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Coverage is comparable to other similar song articles.

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Article accurately represents the mixed critical response the song received.

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I believe the fair-use rationale to be appropriate for the two images included.

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

:Pending fix to self-reference. Sasata (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Meets GA criteria, article promoted. Sasata (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

1. Sorry for the late reply. I replaced that link with that from Andrew Metz's book. It has a list of all the videos and the tracklists. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)