Talk:William Attaway/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Maclean25 (talk · contribs) 22:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good article review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article? for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
See WP:LEAD. The lead section should summarize the contents of the entire article.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
One images used File:William Attaway.jpg claiming fair use. Do you know who the copyright holder is?
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments:
I understand this is part of a class project: User:Profhanley/teaching/literature of labor.

Replace the [clarification needed] tag with more detail [1]

Address the {{refimprove}} tag at the top of the page by ensuring all sections have citations indicating where the information is coming from.

You can properly (and consistently) format the references using the cite templates, like {{cite journal}}{{cite book}} {{cite web}}.

Find a more scholarly reference than enotes.com. Where did resources did the enotes editor use to write that article?

Conclusion

I will continue the review if there is work done to address these above notes. If there is no response, I will fail the article. maclean (talk) 22:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It has been 2 weeks with little done to address the identified issue. I am closing this review now. Due to the above issues the article currently does not meet the GA criteria. maclean (talk) 03:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]