Talk:William Brattle House

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coordinates[edit]

{{geodata-check}} The coordinates need the following fixes:

Write here : This house appears in the wrong place in Google maps. It shows up in the Roxbury neighborhoood of Boston rather than in Cambridge.

66.105.110.2 (talk) 19:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates appear okay now. BrainMarble (talk) 22:15, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking. Strange that this was mentioned in April 2009, as I made the correction here in October 2008. Perhaps it takes Google maps a while to catch on or catch up. Hertz1888 (talk) 23:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google now has it right, too. That must have been the explanation. Done. Hertz1888 (talk) 23:30, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]