Talk:William E. Caswell

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Biographies Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Untitled

This article was nominated for deletion: see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/William E. Caswell. There was no consensus, therefore the article was kept. — Gwalla | Talk 05:50, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I object to the re-nomination of this article for deletion, and in accordance with Wikipedia policy I will remove the notice after explaining my objections. The summation of the discussion in 2005 as "no consensus" gives an inaccurate picture of what occurred then. The article was initially a stub with little info. Someone proposed it for deletion and two people agreed. Then I dug up background information that clearly showed notability -- in particular the Physics Today obituary linked from the article. I should mention that the mere existence of an obituary printed in Physics Today shows that the physics community consider him notable, quite aside from the content of said obituary. Once the article had been augmented with the new material, two later reviewers agreed that Caswell is notable. No later reviewer said he wasn't. In my opinion, this is consensus that the article should be kept. I hope it will not again be nominated for deletion. betsythedevine (talk) 08:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missing image

This article used to have an image attached to it but that has become a redlink. If anybody has a good free image, this article could use one. There is a picture of Bill online here, but the image is non-free: http://projects.washingtonpost.com/911victims/william-e-caswell/ betsythedevine (talk) 04:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William E. Caswell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130727095710/http://names.911memorial.org/ to http://names.911memorial.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]