Talk:William Flakefield
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled[edit]
I know that if it's already on Wikisource then it meets notability guidelines, but the wording in this article makes it seem like none of the info is verified. The article uses these phrases throughout: "it is said" "this may be" "may probably have been" "Probably" "seems to have". It's like the author is just guessing. LogicalFinance33 (talk) 23:21, 15 November 2011 (UTC)