Talk:William Fuller (American football)

William Fuller (American football) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 3, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
May 7, 2007	Good article reassessment	Kept
September 7, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 2, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that retired American football player William Fuller* is one of the few players in National Football League history to record 100 career quarterback sacks?*
Current status: Good article

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

National Football League High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

College football High‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

GA nomination[edit]

The article has failed please expand in references, provide images, and expand the article after that it probably would pass, cheers. Lakers 04:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There generally isn't much info about Fuller (he didn't have an article until a month ago), also no free images seem to exist:[1], and the article is tremendously well sourced. WP:WIAGA allows for shorter articles (criteria 3), the important question is whether any important information is left out. As the criteria states: "it addresses all major aspects of the topic" which this article does (not every article can be 20+kbs it's wrong to assume they even can be). I feel your review was hasty and I'm going to re-list it. However, I'll wait a day or two for your comments. Quadzilla99 07:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my mistake, good point it has passed now that you have clarified whatever was contested however if this was to go to FA I don't think it would make it unless you were aiming for GA only, regards. Lakers 07:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I didn't see any books on there. I'll keep an eye out for one and maybe I can get it through my library. The Houston Chronicle's online archives were helpful somewhat, but like I said there wasn't much more than "Fuller recorded two sacks" or "Fuller is likely to make the Pro Bowl" kind of mentions in the articles. Quadzilla99 07:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I only found two, [2] and [3] Lakers 08:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:William Fuller (American football)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment. This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, --Jackyd101 (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):

Prose is of a high standard, although remember that numbers less than ten should be written using letters rather than numerals. --Jackyd101 (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

Images would be very nice nad it is a shame the article is currently without any.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Overall:
a Pass/Fail:

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:William Fuller (American football)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

We need info to help expand it if possible and some free use images if possible also. Quadzilla99 13:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's one source I got for a little expansion:=5431&state=GJ Quadzilla99 00:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC) — Used that one in the article, might still be some useful info in there. Quadzilla99 13:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's one more:[4] Quadzilla99 13:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 22:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Fuller (American football). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070207231826/http://www.databasefootball.com/players/playerpage.htm?ilkid=FULLEWIL01 to http://www.databasefootball.com/players/playerpage.htm?ilkid=FULLEWIL01

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]