Jump to content

Talk:William the Carpenter/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    There a high degree of reliance on primary sources, but I can understand how that is dictated by the obscure nature of the subject.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    It is short, but again, it's an obscure subject and I think you've gotten a lot out of it.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Reviewer: Lampman (talk) 15:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]