This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– Recommending that the primary topic be changed to the wrestler; pageviews for the musician average only single digits daily, whereas the wrestler gets about 20 times more. 162 etc. (talk) 01:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support 1st, neutral on 2nd. The views are 31,444 v 883 for this one but PT swaps can cause problems but in this case the views are clear and there are only 2 topics. Crouch, Swale (talk) 07:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support 1st move per nom, but Neutral on 2nd move. Primary topic swaps can often cause problems, so a dab page might be the safest bet at the moment. Paintspot Infez (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clear primary. There isn't anything that prohibits primary swaps when the case is clear, and they don't cause issues any more than other major moves, and they are prohibited by neither policy or precedent when there is otherwise no substance-based argument against a consensus. --Yaksar(let's chat)15:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
