Talk:Wilmot Redd

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wilmot Redd article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: Massachusetts / Salem Witch Trials Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Salem Witch Trials task force.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Folklore Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Note on revert[edit]

Two things: the quote about what the neighbors thought was never stated by any such neighbors, nor does the author of the quote say so. It is merely speculation by the author of the book on how the neighbors perceived the threat posed by Wilmot Redd. Also, Salem Village is a historical place which is no longer in existence and the article redirects to Danvers, Massachusetts: wikilinking isn't very helpful.

Also, most of the other changes were stylistic preferences. It's generally correct to use the full name in the first reference in a paragraph, and just the surname in later references. This, however, isn't a rule set in stone. I would say that all of the wording used is correct grammar, but it's not necessarily everyone's preference. --Keitei (talk) 22:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with some of your points and disagree with others. Regarding your first paragraph: I agree; points taken. Paragraph two: phrases separated with a comma should have some commonality. "Wife of fisherman Samuel Redd" doesn't have anything to do with "she was known for her irritability." Also, her having been "Born in Marblehead, Massachusetts," does not lead to "she was hanged on September 22, 1692." I reworded these sentences so they make more sense. Also, Wikipedia generally does not use titles like "Mrs.", and it's redundent to spell out her full name more than once or twice, if there's no chance of confusion. Cheers, Fang Aili ^talk 23:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, alright. The "wife of..." I was using as an appositive (mostly because a million billion sentences beginning with "she" drive me up a wall). If it's confusing, sure, that can be changed. Birth and death seemed to be related in my mind, beginnings and endings. As for the "Mrs.", sure, I think I just didn't change it when I was editing the oldid. --Keitei (talk) 01:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]