Jump to content

Talk:Winterfell (Game of Thrones episode)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 15 April 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Winterfell (Game of Thrones episode) per overwhelming consensus. This move was already carried out by Hijiri88 who didn't realise a discussion was taking place. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:04, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Winterfell (Game of Thrones)Winterfell (episode) – "Game of Thrones" does not distinguish from the subject of the "Winterfell" page, which also refers to a concept in Game of Thrones. 86.41.248.128 (talk) 21:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. B dash (talk) 05:00, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would support a move to "Winterfell (Game of Thrones episode)", but as one of the other users mentioned, all the GoT episodes that have a similar way of formating titles need to get moved as well. Keivan.fTalk 12:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Have since changed my opinion to support, after reading through the other comments, I have no issue with a name change. QueerFilmNerdtalk 23:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The guidelines for songs and TV episodes appear to be different. It's been already mentioned above by someone. Keivan.fTalk
I've read all the comments, and others updated votes, and I'm minded to support the move to Winterfell (Game of Thrones episode), but I still oppose the move to Winterfell (episode). I would also support other Game of Thrones episode page moves with the same proviso. Somethingwickedly (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
N.B. I will shortly create a similar discussion at High Sparrow (Game of Thrones), to disambiguate from High Sparrow (latter article being the character), and at Dragonstone (Game of Thrones), according to AdA&D's reasoning, if anyone wanted to know. --TedEdwards 23:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
After reading through the comments I have no issue with a name change. QueerFilmNerdtalk 23:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@TedEdwards: If you a start a move request for the episodes that have similar form of naming, such as "High Sparrow", "Fire and Blood", etc. then I would also support this name change. My only concern was about consistency, but now that all of them are going to get moved, I don't see any problem here anymore. Keivan.fTalk 12:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keivan, so you mean Fire and Blood (Game of Thrones)Fire and Blood (Game of Thrones episode), for instance? While consensus is based on compromise and I'm not against your idea (it doesn't cause any ambiguity), I would need an explanation as to why it's neccessary that/better if the titles are consistent with each other in order to support a move (and therefore start an RFM), rather than be neutral to it. --TedEdwards 17:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
FYI see my link to the WP:NCTV discussion below. If the proposal passes then we won't need RMs for these, they can be done as uncontroversial technical moves to align with (new) policy. -- King of 04:08, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, Winterfell (episode) is not a good idea. Including the name of the show appears to be standard, per the above-linked Doctor Who RM. Hijiri 88 (やや) 06:11, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content

Why was this article moved while an RM was in place? A notice was and is in the article. Disappointing. 193.115.115.177 (talk) 02:43, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@193.115.115.177: The better question would be why you are logging out of your account to post an off-topic, harassing comment. Disappointing. I know I shouldn't be humoring such behaviour, but FWIW I came to this article, saw it's laughably bad title, did not read the article or the tags, and decided to move the page per WP:BOLD. I had already apologized for this misunderstanding below, a full four days before you posted the above. Hijiri 88 (やや) 05:54, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close The bot cannot handle more than one requested move on the same page. * Pppery * has returned 12:07, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Winterfell (Game of Thrones episode)Winterfell (Game of Thrones) – Ongoing move request here Calidum 03:29, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:47, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Anthony Appleyard: I accidentally moved the page while it was already being discussed above. Now that I have noticed that there was an RM taking place, I agree that my action was inappropriate. Calidum (talk · contribs)'s action above, opening an RM to move it back to the unpopular previous title supposedly to let the RM run its course, is arguably worse, but that's beside the point. My unilateral move should be undone for the sake of the above RM. Hijiri 88 (やや) 06:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.