Talk:Worshippers Way

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highways: Asia Low‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Asian Highways Task Force.

Israel Palestine Collaboration

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration, a collaborative, bipartisan effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. For guidelines and a participants list see the project page. See also {{Palestine-Israel enforcement}}, the ArbCom-authorized discretionary sanctions, the log of blocks and bans, and Working group on ethnic and cultural edit wars. You can discuss the project at its talk page.Israel Palestine CollaborationWikipedia:WikiProject Israel Palestine CollaborationTemplate:WikiProject Israel Palestine CollaborationIsrael Palestine Collaboration articles

POV

This article appears to fail NPOV entirely. There are almost no secondary sources and the sources that are utilized only for the anti-Israel perspective. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:49, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that a template was placed right after the very first edit of the article shows that it is not serious and just an act of hasbara and hypocrisy. --Wickey-nl (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome point, but when you get a chance please respond to the actual issue raised herein. Thanks. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:44, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy that you acknowledge, it is a valid argument. --Wickey-nl (talk) 17:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brewcrewer, do you have, besides hollow phrases, something sensible to say? What POV does actually trouble you? --Wickey-nl (talk) 10:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claims

This article seems to be based to a large degree (perhaps entirely) on a court case from 2002. That case makes it clear that the road/way/path in question was in existence long before the 2002 ambush. 2002 Hebron ambush also describes the road as already in existence before the ambush. Is there more to this article than a discussion of the court case that centered around expansion plans of the road? It doesn't seem that notable. Brad Dyer (talk) 19:00, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing. Suggesting that the subject is not notable evokes the suspicion that you have other intensions. Yes, there were already roads, but the question is not simply about the expansion of a few roads and the demolition of a few houses. I suspect that you are fully aware of that. --Wickey-nl (talk) 10:42, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

if the subject is the road as its names implies, the article needs significant rewriting to address, as just one example, the fact that the road existed prior to the 2002 events. If the subject is the expansion of the road following the 2002 ambush and the subsequent court case, I don't think that is notable enough for an encyclopedia article. Brad Dyer (talk) 16:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]