Jump to content

Talk:WrestleMania IX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWrestleMania IX has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 28, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 15, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the WWF Championship match at WrestleMania IX was between Bret Hart and Yokozuna, but Hulk Hogan won the title?

Poster

[edit]

Pretty sure that is not the official WM9 poster. The poster was the image of Bret Hart's face on the hotel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.38.209.220 (talk) 21:07, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WMIXhart.jpg

[edit]

Image:WMIXhart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wmixhulkster.jpg

[edit]

Image:Wmixhulkster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding uneccesary text in the first paragraph

[edit]

If someone is reading this page, there's a good chance they know how pro wrestling works --Smart Mark Greene (talk) 03:29, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is necessary per WP:IN-U and WP:FICTION. Please stop removing it. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 16:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe you are mistaken. Nowhere in the article does it suggest this was a pure athletic contest, and furtermore, mentions of "booking" and other wrestling terms are used throughout. Also, this is the only pro wrestling article I have found that has that ridiculous notice at the top. I am removing it once again, and I ask you to please stop putting it back. It does nothing positive for the article. --Smart Mark Greene (talk) 19:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:JARGON. "Booked" and other wrestling slang isn't understand by those who aren't wrestling fans. Also, see SummerSlam (2003) (a featured article) and The Great American Bash (2005) (which is also a featured article). ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 22:46, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Even though we are not required to explain how movies work in articles about movies, or TV or any other form of fiction, just wrestling. I think it's idiotic and have been against it from the start. TJ Spyke 16:40, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This has to stop. What's next, going to the wiki page for MASH and stating over and over again they weren't really doctors in Korea? --Smart Mark Greene (talk) 19:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That argument has been made countless times before. It's about as effective and meaningful as "The government wants to ban assault weapons? What's next--closing down homeless shelters?" M*A*S*H never pretended to be real, so your analogy is flawed. Deleting the information will be treated as vandalism, as clarification that the events are scripted is required by Wikipedia guidelines. I will readily admit that the phrasing needs some fine-tuning, however, so if you would care to work with WP:PW on fixing it up, that would be wonderful. GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:45, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If it is "required" than please tell me why this is the only wrestling article that has this. I think there's a chance you are mistaken that this is needed. As I stated above, there is enough phrasing in the article that this is not needed, nor have I seen any proof that it is required. Constantly putting this back, and accusing me of vandalism is frankly pretty childish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.26.33.108 (talk) 03:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I forgot to sign in before making the above comment. I think we need this issue resolved, how do we go about doing it? I really don't want to get in to an edit war, but I also really think we should remove the paragraph in question until this is resolved. You, GaryColemanFan, appear to know more about wikipedia than I, so you tell me where we go from here. --Smart Mark Greene (talk) 04:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Every pay-per-view article that has been expanded in the past two months includes this sort of disclaimer. It came up in Featured Article reviews, where it was determined that it is necessary to include this sort of statement if wrestling articles can ever be considered among Wikipedia's best. I'll be completely honest--I don't particularly like it myself. I think there is probably a good way to shorten it and make it sound a little less insulting to wrestling fans. I haven't figured out what it is, yet, but I'm sure it exists. It is important to keep in mind, however, that no Wikipedia article should be written with only a specific group of readers in mind. Every article should be accessible to anyone who might read it, whether they come across it via a wikilink, the random article link, as a GA or FA reviewer, or as a wrestling fan looking for information. GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What about something to the effect of "This was a professional wrestling event, with all matched having predetermined outcomes". I've had similar problems on other wresting articles. One problem I've seen is overkill in telling the reader that it's "fake", i.e. the words 'scripted' or 'worked' in every sentence. I wish I could remember which article this was in, but there was one that featured lines such as "they were booked to win the titles...", which I argued didn't actually say whether they won them or were just booked to, and it was reverted to "they won the titles". Anyway, I'm starting to ramble. What do you think of my proposed disclaimer? --Smart Mark Greene (talk) 05:32, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A new discussion regarding this have been opened here. Feel free to join in. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 14:10, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the text because it's pointless wiki bureaucratting and insisting that it be added is acting in bad faith (but it's in the ruuuuules guyz). Everyone knows wrestling is scripted and there's no real reason to include it.Lusy (talk) 22:36, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:WrestleMania IX/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi, I am reviewing your article for GA. I have already read through it and see no basic problems or areas in need of fixing. One question though. In the sentence "The match between the Steiner Brothers (Rick and Scott) and The Headshrinkers (Samu and Fatu) had little building,..." I assume you mean little buildup? Perhaps you should clarify or wikiling, since it sounds like jargon. —Mattisse (Talk) 21:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced "building" (which was a typo) with "background" in order to remove the jargon. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Although you link names in the lead, perhaps you should link them at first mention in the body of the article. Granted, I am not familiar with the topic, but I had to use "find" to determine if there were links to Tatanka and Shawn Michaels in the first sentence under Background. It's up to you. Perhaps most readers are more sophisticated on the subject than I am. I have only heard of Hulk Hogan, plus some names I recognize from your last article, like Sensational Sherri.
Definitely a good point, especially since I wasn't even consistent with this (eg. Bret Hart was linked in both places, but Tatanka was only linked in one). I added the wikilinks to the background section. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Final GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):Very well written. b (MoS): No obvious MoS issues
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources appear reliable. c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers the event thoroughly b (focused): Remains well focused
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Presents a neutral point of view
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

—Mattisse (Talk) 18:27, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hulk Hogan was never scheduled to drop the WWF Championship to Bret Hart ? It's not 100% sure !

[edit]

"Hulk Hogan was never scheduled to drop the WWF Championship to Bret Hart". How can this be written with a reference to only Hogan's opinion in a 2010 interview in "The Sun" ? Photos were actually made, with Hart & Hogan with the title belt, to prepare a Hart vs Hogan match @ Summerslam '93. That a match was scheduled is not 100% sure (it is, according to Bret Hart), but that no match were scheduled is only Hogan's opinion & is not 100% sure either ! Asmodeos666 (talk) 13:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WrestleMania IX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on WrestleMania IX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:WrestleMania_IX&oldid=1210997736"