Talk:Xeroderma

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 September 2020 and 29 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hdk23ph.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The

The book Heredity in Relation to Eugenics, published in 1911 told on page 134 claimed that xeroderma was caused by bad germoplasm.Agre22 (talk) 00:43, 22 April 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]

References

I added a few references, but I have no idea how reliable they are, so if somebody has an objection please raise it here. Chevy monte carlo 15:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Xerosis cutis into xeroderma

Both of these conditions appear to be about skin dryness, and should therefore me merged. Xeroderma seems to be more commonly used, according to a Google search on "Xerosis cutis" versus Xeroderma. Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:45, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you a 100% Precent considering that they mean the same thing--MarcusPearl95 (talk) 00:43, 24 April 2012 (UTC) i too agree — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.123.67 (talk) 20:48, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I was half way in doing the merge, but I stopped when I did some searching and all of the references to Xeroderma were in relation to Xeroderma Pigmentosum. More research needs to be done in the medical literature before a decision is made either way. Alanl (talk) 07:49, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This source seems bogus

The site, while apparently maintained by a doctor, is rife with typos and grammar errors. I also question the "prevention" heading which claims that using soap "every other day" will help with xeroderma. On the other hand, I am by no means an expert on any of this... what do you folks think?

As of 2013-04-04, the page referenced is no longer indexed at that site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.112.220 (talk) 00:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://doctorslee.com/natural-skin-care/ ^ Lee, Doctor. "Dry Skin Prevention". Retrieved 18 August 2011. 98.240.146.10 (talk) 03:08, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of the brand Nivea is inappropriate

There seems to be a small advert snuck into the prevention section.

leica 18:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leica0000 (talk • contribs)

Why is this Article Encouraging the Use of Skin Creams?

I don't know about you, but I have sensitive skin and allergies and have nasty reactions to skin creams, sunscreens, etc. 108.48.94.155 (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 0 external links on Xeroderma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/x/xeroderma/intro.htm.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]