Jump to content

Talk:XiamenAir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Mflogo.jpg

[edit]

Image:Mflogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mflogo.jpg

[edit]

Image:Mflogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New livery

[edit]

Please take camera of Xiamen Air new livery with blue tail — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minhtuanvn 1995 (talkcontribs) 11:09, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 June 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 10:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Xiamen AirlinesXiamenAir – New official name. WP:AVINAME#Airlines, WP:COMMONNAME, WP:CONCISE. Regards, Sovereign/Sentinel 10:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I dont object to the change but note the official name is still Xiamen Airlines it is only the branding or trading name that has changed. MilborneOne (talk) 18:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think XiamenAir can be considered the most commonly used English-language name. Sovereign/Sentinel 17:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on XiamenAir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on XiamenAir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:49, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on XiamenAir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Theleekycauldron (talk21:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Xiamen Air Boeing 787-8 landing.
A Xiamen Air Boeing 787-8 landing.

5x expanded by Mikelolggmrox (talk). Self-nominated at 04:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

  • @Mikelolggmrox: Reviewing this. FYI, for future reference, what is counted is the characters of the text in the body, not the byte-size. In any case, article went from around 2,300 to 16,000 so that's good enough. Several issues otherwise:
  • I am not comfortable with the "Frequent Flyer Program" as it is. The only source cited in the entire section is a pdf from the airline. I feel like this entire section, per WP:DUE, should be reduced to 1-2 sentences or even removed altogether. FYI, without that section the article is still expanded sufficiently for DYK.
  • The last paragraph of the lead section also gives me a bit of a promotional/SYNTHESIS sense. I recommend removing it altogether.
  • The article in general needs to watch for promotional-sounding words especially when citing primary sources, e.g. "Xiamen Airlines has made innovative breakthroughs in corporate organization"
  • I took several sample sources, and I cannot find assertions made in the text. For example, fourth paragraph of the "History" section asserts that "citizens of Xiamen and overseas Chinese visiting their relatives could only travel by boat or train, and it took a lot of time for Xiamen to communicate with the outside world", not supported by the citation. This might have been WP:OR, or it might be my translate tool messing up.

Might want to do a go-through of the entire article to make sure it is up to editorial standards first. Juxlos (talk) 12:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Could you do a couple more passes? I still see a good number of such sentences and words, and while at it check for some copyediting for the punctuations. There are also several sentences that look like crude translations from Chinese and reads awkwardly in English. Juxlos (talk) 16:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still not satisfied. The quantity of promotional-sounding prose in the article is still excessive. I think the article needs, effectively, a total rewrite before it will be eligible for the main page. Another reviewer may offer a different opinion, but I will not be passing this until said total rewrite has been done. Juxlos (talk) 15:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Missing list of destinations

[edit]

Where are they?! RPC7778 (talk) 03:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]