Talk:Yaakov ben Moshe Levi Moelin

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dehn's attribution Maharil as author of the "Book of Abramelin" has been disputed...?[edit]

Near the end of the article it is stated that:

Recently, the German esoteric scholar Georg Dehn has argued that the MaHaRIL was also the author of The Book of Abramelin which he wrote under the pseudonym of Abraham von Worms. However, this is disputed.

The last phrase leads to a citation. The citation leads to "http://www.themagickalreview.org/reviews/book-of-abramelin.php", a link which leads to error 404. The whole site is unavailable, in fact. I have since found partial archives of it's content, but no one cared to archive the one cited.

Is there any real dispute to Dehn's research, properly articulated, substantiated, peer reviewed and published?

If there is none, I am going to remove the statement — "However, this is disputed."

--PedroLamarao (talk) 14:54, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have been researching this topic for some time. Cannot find any sources that dispute Dehn's authorship claim, though it is easily disputable, should be disputed, and certainly would be if the subject had wider academic interest. EarlyBuddhistScholar (talk) 05:21, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]