Jump to content

Talk:Yakov and the Seven Thieves/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 16:02, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take this. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 16:02, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


*My first thought is that most distinguished literature articles have, in addition/association with a reception section, typically have an "Analysis" or "Interpretations" section. There seems to be some material in the "Reception" section that could migrate to and populate an "Analysis"-type section. Another more backstage sort of concern would be that within the "Background" section, perhaps there should be a distinct subsection for the book's illustration.

    • Can you give me an example of such content? I would love to expand to an analysis section. The illustration is fine to be a part of the book's background. —IB [ Poke ] 05:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Browsing the GA list, the books with such sections are more widely-known classics, in the vein of Cat in the Hat, The Tale of Peter Rabbit, The Jungle Book- perhaps Yakov has critical commentary only in the form of reviews, rather than more academic evaluation. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 21:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • You are correct @QatarStarsLeague:, I did not find any academic or journalistic entry for analysis and all, which would help us in developing a section of such name. The book is a frivolous release by a popstar, according to me it sure won't get the academic credibility ever unlike say works by Roald Dahl or Enid Blyton etc. —IB [ Poke ] 04:35, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


*Beyond that, my only questions would be about the "Release history" section. Obviously having been released in a host of places, why are dates dealt for just two individual countries?


Great work, just a couple of things to fix. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 03:51, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The release history section I think you can ignore for the time-being. I'm still collating the actual release dates for different nations. —IB [ Poke ] 05:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]