Talk:Yakovlev Yak-25 (1947)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
military
[edit]It would be good if the lead used the word military in the opening sentence. I am going to make this change, but I assume that it is something that, if accepted as good form, would need to be repeated in many articles, and I would need guidance.
Background: I stumbled onto this article (wasn't what I was looking for) but then struggled for several moments to ascertain what sort of aircraft it was - I didn't recognize the word interceptor at first. Jd2718 15:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- I take it back for now. I see this as necessary, but am not sure how to make the change without disrupting the lead. I will go to the Wikiproject and see if someone there has good ideas for wording. Jd2718 15:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Yak-30
[edit]Merge or separate ? Need some opinions —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mothmolevna (talk • contribs) 14:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC).
No page numbers were used in the citations, so I've dropped it one level.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation
[edit]This page need a disambiguation note with the Yak-25 family of 1952 and later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.6.224.137 (talk) 19:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
tailplane section
[edit]Removed "To cure the buffeting the tail unit was replaced with one using an NACA 004 aerofoil section.[1]" The quoted section doesn't make sense ; it certainly wouldn't be 20% t/c ratio with max thickness at 25%, that would be ridiculous, and there is not a dicky bird about a "NACA 004" section in NACA airfoil OR [1]. Anybody any ideas?--Petebutt (talk) 15:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ Gordon quotes 20% thickness, while NACA004 is rarely used in tail units thicker than 9%
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- Start-Class Soviet aviation articles
- Soviet aviation task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- Start-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles