This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Please read WP:RS, WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Using a staff page from a university is supplementary material, not a secondary source. All it demonstrates is that the academic exists: it does not attest to their notability. If being a published academic were enough to demonstrate notability, there would be hundreds of thousands of Wikipedia articles for academics. While guidelines for WP:SCHOLAR may allow for some slack, there are overriding policies and guidelines which preclude adding a scholar simply because they exist. As a fundamental principle, WP:IINFO should be applied. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Page of university is reliable source. Which information is poorly sourced? Hrytsak is not average academic, he won award of "Przegląd Wschodni". For everybody who are interesting in today historiography of Ukraine, it is obvious. Kmicic (talk) 08:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I note that you've selected an article from Rzeczpospolita for your sources. Interesting, as it's noted for its nationalist POV. The write up in the English version Wikipedia article has only noted a mild tendency towards Polish nationalism, and the article you've selected seems... well. I think he may just be a little more well-known (or well loved) by Polish nationalists. Do you think it would be worth my developing this aspect further? I'm getting the distinct feeling that he is less famous than controversial, and it wouldn't serve the purposes of a neutral Wikipedia article to misrepresent an academic. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What can I say? Only this: not sure if serious or trolling. Kmicic (talk) 11:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hrytsak doesn't appear to be a visiting academic at CEU any longer. Please see the Faculty of History. Neither did he show up on a search of the entire CEU site. The content of this article needs to be updated to reflect this fact, as well as establish what institution he is currently actually attached to. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
