Talk:Yes–no question

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Theoretical Linguistics Task Force.

[Untitled][edit]

The page reads in part:

>There is an ambiguity in English as to whether certain questions actually are yes-no >questions in the first place. Syntactically identical questions can be semantically >different. This can be seen by considering the following two examples, both of which are >ambiguous:[5] > > * Did John play chess or checkers? > * Did anyone play chess or checkers? > >Each of the questions could be a yes-no question or could be a choice question. They >could be asking the yes-no question of whether John/anybody played either of the games, >to which the answer is yes or no; or they could be asking the choice question (which does >not have a yes-no response) of which of the two games John/anybody played (with the >presupposition that they played one or the other), to which the answer is the name of the >game.

Am I missing something, or is that bullshit? If you're asked "Did anyone play chess or checkers?", and you answer "chess", you're actually saying "Yes. Chess." There's no syntactic ambiguity as in the first question, which could be read "Did John (play chess or checkers)?" or "Which did John play, (chess) or (checkers)?" You can ask "Did anyone (play chess or checkers)?" but you can't ask "Which did anyone play, (chess) or (checkers)?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.34.183.13 (talk) 07:48, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from the fact that you are confusing syntax with semantics, you are coming to the wrong place to argue about this. Wikipedia isn't the place for Random Anonymous Someones On Internet to argue that linguists are wrong. You instead should take this up directly with James Higginbotham, erstwhile professor at the MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy and now professor of Philosophy and Linguistics at USC. These precise examples, repeated by a number of other papers on yes-no questions, are originally his, from 1993. Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (talk) 16:51, 19 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Consider removing the merging template[edit]

The yes-no questions are one particualr type of open-ended questions. Now I consider merging yes-no into open-ended. --TransportObserver (talk) 18:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How such questions are posed[edit]

In the 'How such questions are posed' section, Russian is given as an example of a language that uses a question word to form yes-no questions; that's not true. Russian uses intonation. Unless someone has evidence to the contrary, the example of Russian should be removed. --Matt Keefe (talk) 18:04, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lede[edit]

Could someone write a lede for this please? 9³ 19:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

French si[edit]

In French, si is a positive answer to a negative question, or more generally a contradiction to a negative statement. I wonder how many other languages have such a specialized word; I have not encountered any. —Tamfang (talk) 01:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]