Talk:Yosemite National Park trademarks dispute

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

As written, this article appears to show substantial bias toward one of the parties to the suit. More neutral reporting would be appropriate. Jonwithnoh (talk) 22:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I checked all the copy to every source cited. It all looks legit. If there is bias, I don't see it. 209.239.115.56 (talk) 08:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize ahead of time if I am using this page incorrectly... new to helping with editing, but hoping to get attention of someone more experienced. Specifically, the references to news articles in Buffalo News are no longer good and I have not been able to find those exact articles at a difference url. I did find another similar article in the Sacramento Bee^[1] which seems to have some information that would replace the original references. And there are law journal articles as well that may provide more insight, but I only found downloadable pdf's of those and not sure how that works for reference. Also, I searched through wikipedia guidelines briefly and will continue regarding referencing to a page archive instead of the original in case the original disappears. e.g. the Sacramento Bee article is in the Wayback Machine^[2], so as an alternative it may be possible to find an archive of the original articles and just replace the original link with the archive link url? In any case, hopefully someone is monitoring this page that knows more about what they are doing. Swgordon (talk) 18:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

[1] ttp://www.sacbee.com/news/business/article134321394.html

[2] ttps://web.archive.org/web/20170911154927/http://www.sacbee.com/news/business/article134321394.html

[1]

[2]