Talk:Youyang Gu COVID model

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 10:35, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Does not satisfy WP:DYKSG#D7

  • ... that Facebook's Chief AI Scientist called Youyang Gu's COVID model "the most accurate" model in projecting the number of deaths caused by COVID-19? Source: Yann LeCun (@ylecun), Twitter, May 18 2020 "Youyang Gu's model is the most accurate to predict deaths from Covid-19. IHME is pretty much the worst." [1]
    • ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)

Created by Bri (talk). Self-nominated at 00:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is new enough (created May 25) and long enough (prose at 1,586 characters).
  • Article is written in NPOV and contains sufficient inline citations. Earwig returns no copyvio concerns.
  • Hook is of acceptable length (147 characters), is adequately cited, and should appeal to a broad audience.
  • QPQ is done.
  • Looks great to me—overall a very interesting and well written article. Good to go. Armadillopteryxtalk 10:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi I came by to promote this, and removed the stub tag, but the article still seems barely start-class. There is only one sentence in the lead describing the model. I think there should be at least one section with more description of how it works. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 21:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I will not be improving this further at this time; I'm involved in other projects. I see under WP:DYKNOT Articles must meet the basic criteria set out on this page but do not have to be of very high quality. It is fine for articles to be incomplete (though not unfinished), to have red links, to be capable of being expanded or improved further, and so on. As DYK's main purpose is to showcase new and improved content, it is not expected that articles appearing on DYK would be considered among the best on Wikipedia. which seems to be the opposite of what you're saying above. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Bri: I'm quoting Rule D7. Having one sentence describing the model makes this a work in progress. Yoninah (talk) 22:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]