Talk:Yunus Social Business
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Yunus Social Business – Global Initiatives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150505003314/http://www.yunussb.al/index.php/en/ to http://www.yunussb.al/index.php/en/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Many problems indeed
[edit]{{multiple issues| {{advert|date=April 2019}} {{notability|Companies|date=April 2019}} {{peacock|date=April 2019}} {{undisclosed paid|date=April 2019}} {{COI|date=November 2020}} }}
Yeah, this article does indeed have many problems, and unfortunately they are all legitimate. Even the rare sentence that is directly informative lacks citations.
Unless some additional strong citations come out of the weeds, I don't see how this article can be salvaged as simultaneously notable and informative.
I'm a pro-social inclusionist, so it pains me to say this, but at the same time that's the best time to wade into the talk page, because even my rose coloured glasses can't escape the reality of this page's present lamentable condition. — MaxEnt 20:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)