Talk:Yves De Koninck
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tag
[edit]not sure why this was tagged as puffery - i removed the reference to award-winning. Is this ok? Doupidou (talk) 00:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, that was the most conspicuous issue. I've fixed a couple more. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for this, and for all the formatting also. Doupidou (talk) 01:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Not sure i know why all the family relations were removed, but a single uncle was left (he is prof emeritus)? A prof emeritus aunt was removed... Could a section about family be included, or is this not appropriate for a person's page? Thanks in advance for your insight. Doupidou (talk) 01:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- You are very welcome. Generally, family are not covered in that much detail in biographical pages here. I left the uncle because he also worked in neuroscience, and therefore seemed relevant. --Tryptofish (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- By way of further explanation, I should say that Wikipedia gets a lot of articles started about people in academia who do not really satisfy our criteria for notability, and the articles end up being deleted. That is why I wanted to make sure that the article here was not overselling the subject. --Tryptofish (talk) 01:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for this explanation. Much appreciated. Doupidou (talk) 01:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
I note this is now tagged as COI, but without explanation. I also note this was tagged as COI by the same person who removed a piece of text that was not referenced. However, that part had been simply translated from the french wikipedia [1]. That is probably not a good reference, I agree. But can i remove the COI tag? Or can I submit this for revision somewhere? Doupidou (talk) 00:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
References
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Yves De Koninck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160306111913/http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?nid=901059 to http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?nid=901059
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
coi tag removal
[edit]I read the help for maintenance template removal Help:Maintenance_template_removal#Addressing_the_flagged_problem. It says, in when to remove: Quote:
"If the maintenance template is not fully supported. Some neutrality-related templates, such as
![]() | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. |
(associated with the conflict of interest guideline) and
![]() | The neutrality of this article is disputed. |
(associated with the neutral point of view policy), require the tagging editor to initiate a dialogue (generally on the article's talk page), to support the placement of the tag. If the tagging editor failed to do so, or the discussion is dormant, the template can be removed."
So i removed the tag. Doupidou (talk) 15:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class neuroscience articles
- Unknown-importance neuroscience articles