Talk:Zappa (chess)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
old talk
[edit]In the WCCC Zappa drew only to Futé, who finished the entiere tournament with 1/2 points, just the draw against Zappa, the winner ! Strange.
Rybka?
[edit]Is Zappa stronger than Rybka?
- Rybka has higher ratings, I believe, but Zappa just beat it 5.5 to 4.5 in a match. Bubba73 (talk), 02:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Meanwhile, Version 3 of Rybka has been released. The following is a custom selection of various Rybka and Zappa ratings, from CCRL:
- http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/cgi/compare_engines.cgi?class=None&num_best_in_class=1&family=Rybka&family=Zappa&print=Rating+list&profile_step=50&profile_numbers=1&table_size=100&ct_from_elo=0&ct_to_elo=10000&match_length=30&cross_tables_for_best_versions_only=1&sort_tables=by+rating&diag=0&reference_list=None&recalibrate=no
- (sorry for the URL monster; tinyurl don't work here)
- There, the Rybka 3 single(!) 64 bit version is rated 3157, and the highest rated Zappa engine, Mexico II 64 bit 4 CPU is rated 3075, with error margins smaller than +/- 20 each. Nevertheless, currently, we can find this last Zappa version on the 4th rank in quad-cpu ratings, still.
- CCRL CEGT --80.121.69.145 (talk) 05:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Zappa (chess). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.acoz.net/zappa/
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20051122182139/http://www.ru.is:80/wccc05/ to http://www.ru.is/wccc05/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Zappa (chess). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140330145657/http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/rybka-disqualified-and-banned-from-world-computer-chess-championships/ to http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/rybka-disqualified-and-banned-from-world-computer-chess-championships/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)