Talk:Zec Dumoine

This article was nominated for deletion on September 22, 2014. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Quebec / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

G4 nomination[edit]

While the version of the page that was deleted on 4 October 2014 was much shorter than the re-created version, that was because I'd removed some machine-translated stuff; there is little observable difference here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:56, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Gaétan Veillette 12:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC) KEEP - This article present an important protected areas of Abitibi-Témiscamingue in Quebec covering territory of 1500 km2. This protected territory is major for the forestry in this region. It is surprising that the English-speaking internet user is against the existence of an article on "Zec Dumoine" when there are 85 other protected areas in Quebec that have the status of ZEC (meaning ni French "Zone d'exploitation contrôlé" or Controlled Harvesting Zone). These controlled zones established in 1978 by the Quebec government make the territory accessible to the general public. ZECs are administered actively by non-profit organizations for the exploitation of resources within the parameters established by law. It would be good if the protester instead invests in useful initiatives to advance the content of this universal encyclopedia, rather than asking to delete the articles that serve the public well. This article is well written and does not hurt anyone. This article is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. There is no valid reason to withdraw it.Veillg1 Gaétan Veillette 12:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)