Talk:Zi Teng

Hong Kong Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (58) • B-Class articles (283)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (998)

Image needed (344)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,346) • Stub-Class articles (6,689)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (404) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,260)

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 3 November 2006. Further details are available here.

November 2006[edit]

Hi Fang Aili, can you kindly elaborate what does the fair use rationale mean? Thanks.

0101andyho06 05:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amidst all the discussions and editings, the 7.4- T shirt remains strangly unnoticed, hiding under the "publications" header. Is it of any relevance?

In addition, I find the table of sexual services rather inappropriate. If I want to know about the price, and places for whatever services, I wouldn't have searched for Zi Teng. Deleting it.

0101andyho06 15:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys, Please try and shorten section 1.2 0101hannah06 07:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the same way too. It only provides some extra information on the prosecution of sex crimes and should not occupy such a large proportion of the page. We may just leave the subheadings in place, like 'Trafficking in persons to or from Hong Kong', 'Interpretation:SEXUAL AND RELATED OFFENCES', and delete the content underneath, okay?

--0101morris06 15:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding to Andy Ho's comment, I absolutely agree with what he said. I think the part of prostition laws in HK is quite irrelevant in the page of Ziteng. the laws could serves as a background information, but not like quoting the whole page of law here. Instead, we could add an external link for those laws in another wiki page.

--0101betty06 06:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to the profile of sex workers in Hong Kong, I feel that it needs to be removed as it deviates from the Ziteng organisation, who's main role is to promote a better understanding of the people it supports and care for. The profile of sex workers in Hong Kong should be under a different subject.

Events needs description.

T shirts should not be under publications

0101andyho06 06:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)0101andyho06[reply]

External links[edit]

Please review WP:EL and reduce the number of links accordingly. Most of them are not relevant enough for this article (they might be fine for other articles). Thank you, Kusma (討論) 20:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images[edit]

To whom it may concern, the fair use images in this article need fair use rationales. If they aren't added after 7 days the images will be deleted. Cheers, Fang Aili ^talk 20:29, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

English Translation[edit]

Zi Teng translates as Wisteria sinensis, not Acorus calamus as stated in the article. Is there a misunderstanding here, or shall I change it?217.43.226.218 (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've put in an 'other sources say...' qualification. I guess that's the best we can do unless the organisation themselves correct their website.217.43.226.218 (talk) 13:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Zi Teng. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]